
Many works on surrogate-assisted evolutionary multiobjective optimization have been devoted to problems where function evaluations are time-consuming (e.g., based on simulations). In many real-life optimization problems, mathematical or simulation models are not always available and, instead, we only have data from experiments, measurements or sensors. In such cases, optimization is to be performed on surrogate models built on the data available. The main challenge there is to fit an accurate surrogate model and to obtain meaningful solutions.We apply Kriging as a surrogate model and utilize corresponding uncertaintyinformation in different ways during the optimization process. We discuss experimental results obtained on benchmark multiobjective optimization problems with different sampling techniques and numbers of objectives. The results show the effect of different ways of utilizing uncertainty information on the quality of solutions.
mallintaminen, Pareto optimality, Päätöksen teko monitavoitteisesti, pareto-tehokkuus, etamodelling, Decision analytics utilizing causal models and multiobjective optimization, Surrogate, Multiobjective Optimization Group, monitavoiteoptimointi, Computational Science, koneoppiminen, Metamodelling, Machine learning, surrogate, normaalijakauma, Gaussian process, Laskennallinen tiede
mallintaminen, Pareto optimality, Päätöksen teko monitavoitteisesti, pareto-tehokkuus, etamodelling, Decision analytics utilizing causal models and multiobjective optimization, Surrogate, Multiobjective Optimization Group, monitavoiteoptimointi, Computational Science, koneoppiminen, Metamodelling, Machine learning, surrogate, normaalijakauma, Gaussian process, Laskennallinen tiede
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
