
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23771
pmid: 35613332
AbstractObjectiveA Smedley hand dynamometer is one of the standard devices for measuring handgrip strength (HGS) for children and adults. The aim was to compare the HGS values using two different types of dynamometers (Grip‐A or Grip‐D) in young children. To enable comparison between the two devices, we have redesigned the Grip‐D (i.e., modified Grip‐D).MethodsTwenty‐five preschool children (10 girls and 15 boys) performed maximal voluntary HGS in the right hand using two different types of dynamometers. We ran a paired sample t‐test on the difference in HGS between the two devices.ResultsThe measured values of HGS were 9.95 kg for Grip‐A and 8.56 kg for modified Grip‐D, and the difference between the two devices [1.39 (SD 0.65) kg] was greater than we expected (95% limits of agreement: 0.11, 2.6 kg). Thus, we then calibrated both dynamometers ourselves using known weights. The measured values were corrected if there was an error between the known weight and each dynamometer. Following adjustment, there was still a statistical difference (p < 0.001) in HGS between Grip‐A [10.65 (SD 1.52) kg] and modified Grip‐D [9.98 (SD 1.85) kg]. However, the difference between the two devices was 0.67 (SD 0.69) kg with the 95% limits of agreement between −0.68 and 2.0 kg.ConclusionIt is concluded that the HGS values of children measured with the company‐calibrated new Grip‐A and modified Grip‐D could provide reasonably close estimates.
Adult, Male, Upper Extremity, Hand Strength, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Hand
Adult, Male, Upper Extremity, Hand Strength, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Hand
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
