
doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.57
pmid: 19690565
pmc: PMC2736654
handle: 1959.8/103274 , 1721.1/60870 , 2144/3204
doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.57
pmid: 19690565
pmc: PMC2736654
handle: 1959.8/103274 , 1721.1/60870 , 2144/3204
In the past decade, computational methods have been shown to be well suited to unraveling the complex web of metabolic reactions in biological systems. Methods based on flux-balance analysis (FBA) and bi-level optimization have been used to great effect in aiding metabolic engineering. These methods predict the result of genetic manipulations and allow for the best set of manipulations to be found computationally. Bi-level FBA is, however, limited in applicability because the required computational time and resources scale poorly as the size of the metabolic system and the number of genetic manipulations increase. To overcome these limitations, we have developed Genetic Design through Local Search (GDLS), a scalable, heuristic, algorithmic method that employs an approach based on local search with multiple search paths, which results in effective, low-complexity search of the space of genetic manipulations. Thus, GDLS is able to find genetic designs with greater in silico production of desired metabolites than can feasibly be found using a globally optimal search and performs favorably in comparison with heuristic searches based on evolutionary algorithms and simulated annealing.
Medicine (General), Flux balance analysis, QH301-705.5, Models, Biological, Evolution, Molecular, R5-920, Report, Escherichia coli, Biology (General), strain optimization, Models, Statistical, Mixed-integer linear programming, Models, Genetic, Escherichia coli Proteins, Systems Biology, flux–balance analysis, Computational Biology, Strain optimization, bi-level optimization, 620, 004, strain optimizatio, flux-balance analysis, bi‐level optimization, Genetic Techniques, Genes, Bacterial, Bi-level optimization, mixed‐integer linear programming, mixed-integer linear programming, metabolic engineering, Metabolic engineering, Algorithms, Genome, Bacterial, Software
Medicine (General), Flux balance analysis, QH301-705.5, Models, Biological, Evolution, Molecular, R5-920, Report, Escherichia coli, Biology (General), strain optimization, Models, Statistical, Mixed-integer linear programming, Models, Genetic, Escherichia coli Proteins, Systems Biology, flux–balance analysis, Computational Biology, Strain optimization, bi-level optimization, 620, 004, strain optimizatio, flux-balance analysis, bi‐level optimization, Genetic Techniques, Genes, Bacterial, Bi-level optimization, mixed‐integer linear programming, mixed-integer linear programming, metabolic engineering, Metabolic engineering, Algorithms, Genome, Bacterial, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 133 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
