
doi: 10.1002/mus.27498
pmid: 35040150
AbstractIntroduction/AimsObjective outcome measures to monitor treatment response and guide treatment are lacking in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). In this study we aimed to evaluate the motor unit number index (MUNIX) as an outcome measurement in patients with CIDP and determine the correlation of MUNIX with functional and standard electrodiagnostic tests in a single follow‐up study.MethodsWe evaluated MUNIX of the abductor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti minimi, and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles bilaterally. Muscle force was assessed by Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRCSS). Functional measures used were the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score (ONLS) and the Rasch‐built Overall Disability Scale (R‐ODS) score at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Standard electrophysiology was evaluated by the Nerve Conduction Study Score (NCSS).ResultsTwenty patients were included at baseline, and 16 completed the follow‐up study. Significant correlations were found between the MUNIX sum score and both MRCSS and NCSS at baseline, between both the pinch strength and grip and upper limb MUNIX at baseline and follow‐up, and between MUNIX of TA and both lower limb MRCSSs with lower limb ONLS at baseline and follow‐up. Significant correlations also were found between MUNIX sum score change and MRCSS change, R‐ODS change, and ONLS change.DiscussionMUNIX changes correlated with strength and electrophysiological improvements in CIDP patients. This suggests that MUNIX may represent a useful objective biomarker for patient follow‐up.
Motor Neurons, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating, Electromyography, Disease Progression, Humans, Biomarkers, Follow-Up Studies
Motor Neurons, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating, Electromyography, Disease Progression, Humans, Biomarkers, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
