Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Agromyzidae

Authors: Sforzi, Alessandra; Sommaggio, Daniele;
Abstract

Agromyzidae This family contains over 3,000 species (Evenhuis & Pape 2020). Rondani (1875b) described 15 Palaearctic nominal species, six considered as valid, six as junior synonyms and three as nomina dubia (Papp 1984b, Spencer & Martinez 1987, Canzoneri et al. 1995, Evenhuis & Pape 2020). In his paper on the Rondani types at MZUB, Morge (1959b) listed three names (nomina nuda) that he attributed to Rondani. Kenneth A. Spencer examined the MZUF types without publishing any lectotype designation (Spencer & Martinez 1987). Here, we designate a lectotype for Domomyza anthracipes Rondani, 1875 and Domomyza frontella Rondani, 1875. Except for two syntypes in the MZLU and one in the MZUB, the type material for all nominal species is in the MZUF.

Published as part of Sforzi, Alessandra & Sommaggio, Daniele, 2021, Catalog of the Diptera types described by Camillo Rondani, pp. 1-438 in Zootaxa 4989 (1) on page 29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4989.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4980621

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Agromyzidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 8
  • 8
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
8
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!