Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Neuroscie...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Neuroscience
Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Human α4β2 Acetylcholine Receptors Formed from Linked Subunits

Authors: Yan Zhou; Mark E. Nelson; Alexander Kuryatov; Catherine Choi; John Cooper; Jon Lindstrom;

Human α4β2 Acetylcholine Receptors Formed from Linked Subunits

Abstract

We prepared concatamers of α4 and β2 subunits for human nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (AChRs), in which the C terminus of α4 was linked to the N terminus of β2, or vice versa, via a tripeptide sequence repeated 6 or 12 times, and expressed them inXenopusoocytes. Linkage did not substantially alter channel amplitude or channel open-duration. Linkage at the C terminus of α4 prevented AChR potentiation by 17-β-estradiol by disruption of its binding site. Assembly of AChRs from concatamers was less efficient, but function was much more efficient than that of unlinked subunits. With both linked and free subunits, greater ACh-induced currents per surface AChR were observed with the (α4)3(β2)2stoichiometry than with the (α4)2(β2)3stoichiometry. The (α4)3(β2)2stoichiometry exhibited much lower ACh sensitivity. When concatamers were expressed alone, dipentameric AChRs were formed in which the (α4)2(β2)3pentamer was linked to the (α4)3(β2)2pentamer. Dipentamers were selectively expressed on the cell surface, whereas most monopentamers with dangling subunits were retained intracellularly. Coexpression of concatamers with monomeric β2, β4, or α4 subunits resulted in monopentamers, the stoichiometry of which was determined by the free subunit added. Linkage between the C terminus of β2 and the N terminus of α4 favored formation of ACh-binding sites within the concatamer, whereas linkage between the C terminus of α4 and the N terminus of β2 favored formation of ACh-binding sites between concatamers. These protein-engineering studies provide insight into the structure and function of α4β2 AChRs, emphasizing the functional differences between α4β2 AChRs of different stoichiometries.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    156
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
156
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze