Contrast venography, the accepted gold standard for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis of the leg, is a painful and invasive procedure with late side effects. There is controversy in literature reports about the sensitivity of 99Tcm-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) phlebography: indeed, using 99Tcm-MAA, poor results are obtained when one has to detect calf vein thrombosis. As with other isotopic procedures requiring a pedal injection of the tracer, the use of an injectable solution of 81Krm is a nonspecific method, based upon the abnormality in flow in the deep venous system which results from a deep venous thrombosis. However, when compared with 99Tcm-MAA, 81Krm offers theoretical advantages for phlebographic studies of the lower limbs. In this work 24 patients were studied both with contrast phlebography and with 81Krm. Although 81Krm provided images of high quality, there was a lack of sensitivity below the knee, where false negative results were observed. This could be explained by the fact that the radionuclide venographic procedures usually visualize only one or, in some cases, two of the three deep veins of the calf. Moreover, accurate differentiation between superficial and deep veins in the calf often appears difficult, even using a tourniquet.