
This paper synthesizes two complementary strands—the Postulate of Negativity and the Logos of Chaos—into a unified proto-ontology. Chaos is interpreted as pure negativity; the first distinction emerges when this negativity applies to itself. In philosophy this appears as “negation of negation”, in mathematics as the algebraic law (−1) × (−1) = +1 and double negation ¬¬A ≡ A, and in ontology as the birth of Logos, the filter that extracts the possible from indeterminate potentiality. The result is an operational foundation for Metamonism: oppositions (A vs. A¯) are generated by self-applied negativity and then elaborated by conflict. We motivate this framework historically, articulate its consequences for logic, algebra, and the unity of mathematics and physics, develop testable hypotheses, and show how it renders Metamonism self-justifying while incorporating internal conflict as a source of vitality.
Meta-filtration, Metamonism, Empirical ontology, Negativity, Axiom of reality, Logos, Ontological engineering, Dialectics, Self-differentiation, Algebra of negation, Double negation (¬¬A = A), Ontological design, Multi-filtration universes, Operating system of reality, Gödelian ontology, Negation of negation, Logic and algebra foundations, Proto-ontology, Self-justifying system, Ontological cost, Gradient of filtration, Freedom and meta-filter, Self-reference, Filter of reality, Philosophy of science, Chaos, Mathematics–physics unity
Meta-filtration, Metamonism, Empirical ontology, Negativity, Axiom of reality, Logos, Ontological engineering, Dialectics, Self-differentiation, Algebra of negation, Double negation (¬¬A = A), Ontological design, Multi-filtration universes, Operating system of reality, Gödelian ontology, Negation of negation, Logic and algebra foundations, Proto-ontology, Self-justifying system, Ontological cost, Gradient of filtration, Freedom and meta-filter, Self-reference, Filter of reality, Philosophy of science, Chaos, Mathematics–physics unity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
