Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Đánh giá ảnh hưởng của hốc khí và trường chiếu nhỏ tới phân bố liều của kế hoạch JO - IMRT trên bệnh nhân ung thư đầu cổ bằng phương pháp MONTE CARLO

Authors: Oanh Luong Thi;

Đánh giá ảnh hưởng của hốc khí và trường chiếu nhỏ tới phân bố liều của kế hoạch JO - IMRT trên bệnh nhân ung thư đầu cổ bằng phương pháp MONTE CARLO

Abstract

Purposes: The goal of this study was to use Monte Carlo (MC) simulation to examine the dosimetric effects of the air cavity on JO-IMRT dose distribution at air-tissues interfaces in head-and-neck (H&N) patients. Methods: The EGSnrc - MC code system was used to calculate the dose reductions in air-tissue interface region for single field irradiations with 1×1, 2×2, 3×3, 4×4, and 5×5 cm2 in solid acrylic phantoms (30×30×20 cm3) and seven fields in a JO-IMRT plan. With phantom, the PDD values in both with and without an air cavity (15×4×4 cm3) which is 2.5 cm away from the anterior surface of phantom were used to evaluate. With the JO-IMRT plan, the dose-volume histograms (DVH), slice by slice isodose, and the gamma index using global methods implemented in PTW-VeriSoft with 3%/3 mm criteria were used to evaluate. Results: The study results indicate that the dose reductions in the air-tissue interface region of the phantom are strongly dependent on field size. The average percentage dose reductions at 1 mm from the air‑water interface for the field size 1×1, 2×2, 3×3, 4×4, and 5×5 cm2 are 62.04%, 52.34%, 40.71%, 26.72%, and 19.85%, respectively. Additionally, the mean MC dose in the PTV (65.58 Gy) of patients were lower than the TPS predicted dose (71.41 Gy). Conclusions: From this study, we conclude that the dose reduction in near air-tissue interfaces is a significant effect on JO-IMRT dose distribution in head-and-neck (H&N) patients.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!