
Abstract Country indices as represented by iShares exhibit non-normal return distributions with both skewness and kurtosis. Earlier studies provide procedures for determining the statistical significance of stochastic dominance measures and the Sharpe Ratio. This present study uses these refinements to compare the performance of 18 country market indices. The iShares are indistinguishable when using the Sharpe Ratio as no significant differences are found. In contrast, stochastic dominance procedures identify dominant iShares. Although the results vary over time, stochastic dominance appears to be both more robust and discriminating than the CAPM in the ranking of the iShares.
Stochastic dominance, 330, stochastic dominance, Sharpe ratio, skewness, country index funds, Sharpe ratio, Stochastic dominance; Sharpe ratio; skewness; country index funds, Country index funds, Skewness, jel: jel:G15, jel: jel:G11
Stochastic dominance, 330, stochastic dominance, Sharpe ratio, skewness, country index funds, Sharpe ratio, Stochastic dominance; Sharpe ratio; skewness; country index funds, Country index funds, Skewness, jel: jel:G15, jel: jel:G11
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 85 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
