Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

E-066 A favorable profile for selecting acute ischemic stroke patients for thrombolytic therapy: Abstract E-066 Table 1

Authors: N Moradzadeh; J Sharma; E Vargas; R Jung; B Koo; K Blackham;

E-066 A favorable profile for selecting acute ischemic stroke patients for thrombolytic therapy: Abstract E-066 Table 1

Abstract

BackgroundThere is currently an intense interest in defining predictive profiles from MRI based diffusion/perfusion information for acute ischemic stroke patients. Perfusion/diffusion ratio (mismatch ratio) and penumbra volumes are factors used to select patients for thrombolysis. The current literature considers a mismatch ratio of 1.2 as the minimum for thrombolysis. There is much debate, however, as to how mismatch ratios and penumbra volumes affect patient outcome.Methods31 acute ischemic stroke patients were selected at random and had their presenting acute stroke-protocol MRI processed through OLEA Medical's PerfScape, which calculated the penumbral volume and mismatch ratio, using a Tmax of 4 s. A mismatch ratio of 1.2–4.5 with a penumbra volume >80 cc was labeled as a Favorable Profile (FP). NIHSS scores were collected both at stroke presentation and at time of discharge. An improvement of NIHSS ≥4 at time of discharge was considered a good outcome.ResultsEight patients were found to have a FP with a mismatch ratio between 1.2 and 4.5 and a penumbra volume >80 cc. Twenty-three patients did not have an FP. Of the eight patients with an FP, all 8 had an improvement of ≥4 in their NIHSS score. Of the 23 patients who did not have an FP, 7 had an improvement of ≥4 in their NIHSS score, while 16 had no improvement or an improvement of <4 in their NIHSS score, (p=0.0008). Furthermore, a homogenous subset of patients (N=20) who underwent thrombolytic therapy and achieved TIMI 2 or greater recanalization, showed similar findings (p=0.02)ConclusionThis small study demonstrates that our definition of a favorable MRI perfusion profile in ischemic stroke patients (mismatch ratio of 1.2–4.5 and a penumbra volume >80 cc) was associated with a good outcome at discharge, for all patients as well as an endovascularly treated homogeneous subset. Furthermore, the clinical application of this upper limit of 4.5 for the mismatch ratio warrants further investigation.Abstract E-066 Table 1Favorable profile and NIHSS improvementNIHSS improvement ≥4NIHSS improvement <4Favorable Profile (Mismatch ratio of 1.2–4.5 and penumbra volume >80 cc)80Not a Favorable Profile716Competing interestsNone.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!