Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Medical E...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Medical Entomology
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Terms of Use and Content Access Policy
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Prevalence of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Two Species of Peromyscus Mice Common in Northern Wisconsin

Authors: Scott R. Larson; Xia Lee; Susan M. Paskewitz;

Prevalence of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Two Species of Peromyscus Mice Common in Northern Wisconsin

Abstract

Two species of mice, the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus (Rafinesque; Rodentia: Cricetidae) and the woodland deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus (Wagner; Rodentia: Cricetidae), serve as reservoirs of tick-borne pathogens in many parts of North America. However, the role P. maniculatus plays in the amplification and maintenance of Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Rickettsiales: Ehrlichiaceae) and Borrelia burgdorferi (Spirochaetales: Spirochaetaceae) is not well understood. In northern Wisconsin, from 2012 to 2014, 560 unique mice were captured at 83 sites distributed across five forests. P. leucopus was more likely infested with immature Ixodes scapularis compared to P. maniculatus (60.1 vs. 28.3%). Abundance of immature I. scapularis on P. leucopus (M = 2.69; SD = 3.53) was surprisingly low and even lower for P. maniculatus (M = 0.717; SD = 1.44). Both P. leucopus and P. maniculatus were infected with B. burgdorferi, 24.0 and 16.8%, respectively. The prevalence of A. phagocytophilum infection in P. leucopus (1.69%) was similar to that observed in P. maniculatus (4.73%). Nine of 10 mice co-infected with both pathogens were P. maniculatus, and there were more co-infections in this species than expected by chance (3.07 vs. 0.82%). Differences in the behavior and biology between these two mice species may contribute to the variation observed in the abundance of host-attached ticks and pathogen prevalence. These differences highlight a potential hazard of the failure to differentiate between these visually similar mice, but there is evidence that these two mice species can each serve as reservoirs for tick-borne pathogens that cause human disease in Wisconsin.

Keywords

Male, Anaplasmosis, Rodent Diseases, Peromyscus, Wisconsin, Species Specificity, Tick-Borne Diseases, Borrelia burgdorferi, Prevalence, Animals, Female, Borrelia Infections, Anaplasma phagocytophilum

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    28
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
28
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!