
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1374851
This paper surveys the recent literature on competition between mobile networks in the presence of call externalities and network effects. It argues that the regulation of mobile termination rates based on fully allocated costs, or “long-run incremental cost plus”, exacerbates the network effects associated with “tariff-mediated network externalities”, by increasing mobile networks’ on-net/off-net price differentials. This reduces welfare and acts as barrier to growth for smaller networks and new entrants. The paper argues for the adoption of “bill-and-keep” for mobile termination rates, and responds to recent theoretical arguments which suggest that such a move might harm mobile subscribers.
mobile termination, network effects, call externalities, bill-and-keep, jel: jel:D43, jel: jel:L51, jel: jel:L96
mobile termination, network effects, call externalities, bill-and-keep, jel: jel:D43, jel: jel:L51, jel: jel:L96
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
