Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://zenodo.org/r...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://zenodo.org/record/3764...
Article
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusph...
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
ZENODO
Conference object . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Conference object . 2020
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Ground-based lidar processing and simulator framework for comparing models and observations

Authors: Kuma, Peter; McDonald, Adrian; Morgenstern, Olaf; Querel, Richard; Silber, Israel; Flynn, Connor J.;

Ground-based lidar processing and simulator framework for comparing models and observations

Abstract

<p>Automatic lidars and ceilometers (ALCs) are well-established instruments for remote sensing of the atmosphere, with a large network of instruments deployed globally. Even though they provide a wealth of information about clouds and aerosol, they have not been used extensively to evaluate models. They complement active satellite observations, which are often unable to accurately detect low clouds due to obscuration by mid and high-level clouds. ALCs cannot be used directly for atmospheric model cloud scheme evaluation due to the wavelength-dependent attenuation of the lidar signal by clouds. Therefore, a forward lidar simulator has to be used to transform model fields to simulated backscatter comparable to backscatter measured by ALCs. Here we describe the Automatic Lidar and Ceilometer Framework (ALCF), an open source lidar processing tool and forward ground-based lidar simulator capable of transforming widely-used reanalysis and model output into a data structure which can be directly compared with observations. It implements steps such as conversion, absolute calibration, resampling, noise removal, cloud detection, model data extraction, and forward lidar simulation. The simulator is based on the Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) Observation Simulator Package (COSP), previously used with spaceborne lidars, with extensions for several ground-based ALCs. The forward simulator is essential to get from raw ALC and model data to a one-to-one backscatter profile. It also allows statistical comparison of cloud between models and observations. Four common commercial ALCs (Vaisala CL31, CL51, Lufft CHM 15k and Sigma Space MiniMPL), three reanalyses (ERA5, JRA-55, and MERRA-2), and two NWP models and GCMs (AMPS and the Unified Model) are supported. We present case studies evaluating cloud in the supported reanalyses and models using multi-instrument observations at three sites in New Zealand. We show that at these sites the reanalyses and models generally underestimate cloud fraction and overestimate cloud albedo. We demonstrate that the ALCF can be used as a generic cloud evaluation tool. It can assist in improving model cloud simulation, which has been identified as a critical deficiency in contemporary models limiting the accuracy of future climate projections.</p>

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 13
    download downloads 14
  • 13
    views
    14
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
13
14