
doi: 10.1111/apa.14924
pmid: 31265153
AbstractAimWe evaluated what determined breastfeeding problems in a non‐selected mother‐infant cohort, with special reference to tongue‐tie and improvements in breastfeeding following frenulotomy.MethodsThis 2014‐2015 prospective, observational study was carried out in a tertiary level maternity unit affiliated to the University of Freiburg, Germany, using a breastfeeding questionnaire, standardised breastfeeding scores and the Assessment Tool For Lingual Frenulum Function (ATLFF). The standard intervention was breastfeeding support, a frenulotomy for tongue‐tie was performed if necessary. All cases of breastfeeding problems and, or tongue‐tie, were followed up by telephone 2.5 weeks after birth.ResultsWe enrolled 776 newborn‐mother dyads: 345 had breastfeeding problems, 116 had a tongue‐tie and 30 underwent a frenulotomy. In the multivariate analysis, severe breastfeeding problems were more frequent in newborn infants with tongue‐tie, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.6 (P= 0.014). Other risk factors were: no breastfeeding experience (OR 4.4, P = 0.001), low birth weight (OR 2.9, P = 0.001), prematurity (OR 3.6, P = 0.000) and Caesarean section (OR 1.6, P = 0.023). There was a significant reduction in breastfeeding problems after frenulotomy (P = 0.01).ConclusionTongue‐tie had a significant impact on breastfeeding and so did low birth weights and prematurity. Frenulotomy proved helpful when breastfeeding problems were reported.
Male, Breast Feeding, Oral Surgical Procedures, Infant, Newborn, 610, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Ankyloglossia
Male, Breast Feeding, Oral Surgical Procedures, Infant, Newborn, 610, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Ankyloglossia
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
