Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2021
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

SafePASS Personas and Respective Scenarios of Use

Authors: Blake, Juan-Latzke;

SafePASS Personas and Respective Scenarios of Use

Abstract

This is a public deliverable of the EU funded (H2020) project SafePASS. The deliverable number is D2.3. Executive Summary: This deliverable’s main objective is twofold. On one hand, the deliverable’s focus is to consolidate a set of user requirements to facilitate the SafePASS system and entities design process, as well as the definition of the respective system specifications by describing the methodology used. The second goal is to define the appropriate personas to be used in the design process by describing the methodology used, as well as the respective scenarios of use that will further facilitate the system design and reveal the full potential of SafePASS. In order to create the consolidated list, the methodology used for the elicitation of user requirements is described, as well as the sub-groups of requirements that were derived from the Grant Agreement, the analysis of the best practices, gaps and needs, the mission and operational requirements and the stakeholder workshops and surveys. Moreover, ten (10) different Personas are identified and presented analytically, along with their role, status and main characteristics that may affect the scenarios of use and the overall evacuation process. In parallel, six (6) scenarios of use are described, based on the outcomes of the stakeholder workshops and the identified gaps of the state-of-the-art analysis, while their characteristics as the time of the day, the sea state, the location of the vessel and the type of incident are defined. Finally, the ten (10) defined personas are mapped to the six (6) scenarios of use, so as to assess their interconnections with the SafePASS system under varying situations, and the relevant requirements that derive from the special characteristics of both the personas and the scenario conditions, as well as the relevant SafePASS components, are facilitated.

Keywords

safety, passenger ship, cruise ship, evacuation, h2020, maritime

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
    download downloads 2
  • 2
    views
    2
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2
2
Green
Funded by