
In both vertebrate and invertebrate visual systems, neurons form multiple-contact synapses at which a single presynaptic site releases neurotransmitter upon a discrete combination of different postsynaptic cells. Recognition mechanisms underlying the assembly of such synapses are not known. In Drosophila, photoreceptor terminals form tetrad synapses that incorporate an invariable pair of postsynaptic elements, one each from lamina interneuron L1 and L2, and two elements from other cells. Here, we demonstrate that Drosophila Dscam1 and Dscam2, genes encoding homophilic repulsive proteins, act redundantly to ensure the invariable combination of L1 and L2 postsynaptic elements at all tetrads. We demonstrate that this strict pairing is lost in Dscam1;Dscam2 double mutants. Thus, removing these two repulsive proteins allows elements from the same cell to incorporate into the same postsynaptic tetrad, altering the specificity of photoreceptor transmission. We propose that Dscams regulate synaptic specificity by excluding inappropriate partners at multiple-contact synapses.
2800 Neuroscience, Neurons, Self-avoidance, Nervous-system, Neuroscience(all), Animals, Genetically Modified, Nematode caenorhabditis-elegans, Gene Expression Regulation, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Mutation, Synapses, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Drosophila, Visual Pathways, Visual-system, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules
2800 Neuroscience, Neurons, Self-avoidance, Nervous-system, Neuroscience(all), Animals, Genetically Modified, Nematode caenorhabditis-elegans, Gene Expression Regulation, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Mutation, Synapses, Animals, Drosophila Proteins, Drosophila, Visual Pathways, Visual-system, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 70 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
