AbstractAdaptor protein Crk and CrkL were thought to be closely related because both consist of one SH2 and two SH3 domains and share 60% homology with the highest identity within their functional domains. Their functions were most presumed to be in part, if not all, redundant. And both were suggested to be implicated in carcinogenesis. In this study, both Crk and CrkL presented with much higher expression in ovarian cancer tissues than those in normal and benign ovarian tissues. However, in contrast with CrkL, high Crk expression displayed close association with advanced stages and high‐grade diseases. Furthermore, the differential binding selectivity of Crk and CrkL to their downstream partners Dock 180 and C3G was demonstrated in ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3 through coimmunoprecipitation. Additionally, Crk‐knockdown cells presented with changed morphology, reduced growth, and cell invasion but remained viable. In contrast, all CrkL‐knockdown cells could not survive over time, gradually detaching from the bottom of plastic dish. In conclusion, these two highly homologous proteins hold features that allow for the differential association with each binding molecules, thereby activating different signaling pathways and being involved in diverse roles in ovarian cancer. Mol. Carcinog. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.