<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Abstract Aims The aim of this study was to derive and validate the SCORE2-Older Persons (SCORE2-OP) risk model to estimate 5- and 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in individuals aged over 70 years in four geographical risk regions. Methods and results Sex-specific competing risk-adjusted models for estimating CVD risk (CVD mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke) were derived in individuals aged over 65 without pre-existing atherosclerotic CVD from the Cohort of Norway (28 503 individuals, 10 089 CVD events). Models included age, smoking status, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, and total- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Four geographical risk regions were defined based on country-specific CVD mortality rates. Models were recalibrated to each region using region-specific estimated CVD incidence rates and risk factor distributions. For external validation, we analysed data from 6 additional study populations {338 615 individuals, 33 219 CVD validation cohorts, C-indices ranged between 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–0.65] and 0.67 (0.64–0.69)}. Regional calibration of expected-vs.-observed risks was satisfactory. For given risk factor profiles, there was substantial variation across the four risk regions in the estimated 10-year CVD event risk. Conclusions The competing risk-adjusted SCORE2-OP model was derived, recalibrated, and externally validated to estimate 5- and 10-year CVD risk in older adults (aged 70 years or older) in four geographical risk regions. These models can be used for communicating the risk of CVD and potential benefit from risk factor treatment and may facilitate shared decision-making between clinicians and patients in CVD risk management in older persons.
Male, Aging, Myocardial Infarction, 610, 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular, anzsrc-for: 1103 Clinical Sciences, Risk Assessment, anzsrc-for: 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, anzsrc-for: 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, Risk Factors, 80 and over, Humans, 3202 Clinical Sciences, Risk assessment, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, SCORE2-OP working group and ESC Cardiovascular risk collaboration, Primary prevention, 10-Year CVD risk, Prevention, anzsrc-for: 3201 Cardiovascular Medicine and Haematology, 3 Good Health and Well Being, Cardiovascular disease, Risk prediction, Stroke, Heart Disease, 3201 Cardiovascular Medicine and Haematology, Older persons, Cardiovascular Diseases, anzsrc-for: 3202 Clinical Sciences, Female, Patient Safety, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Algorithms, 2.4 Surveillance and distribution
Male, Aging, Myocardial Infarction, 610, 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular, anzsrc-for: 1103 Clinical Sciences, Risk Assessment, anzsrc-for: 32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, anzsrc-for: 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, Risk Factors, 80 and over, Humans, 3202 Clinical Sciences, Risk assessment, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, SCORE2-OP working group and ESC Cardiovascular risk collaboration, Primary prevention, 10-Year CVD risk, Prevention, anzsrc-for: 3201 Cardiovascular Medicine and Haematology, 3 Good Health and Well Being, Cardiovascular disease, Risk prediction, Stroke, Heart Disease, 3201 Cardiovascular Medicine and Haematology, Older persons, Cardiovascular Diseases, anzsrc-for: 3202 Clinical Sciences, Female, Patient Safety, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Algorithms, 2.4 Surveillance and distribution
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 402 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |