
pmid: 15189241
Abstract. The myiasis‐causing flies Cuterebra grisea (Coquillet) and Cuterebra fontinella (Clark) (Diptera: Oestridae) are normally parasites of mice, predominantly of the genus Peromyscus . The morphological similarities of these species and the existence of intermediate morphotypes bearing characters of both species make the identification of adults problematic; furthermore the identification of larvae is apparently not possible. This study presents two molecular approaches to discriminate between these species using specific band patterns: (i) species‐specific primers designed in the cytochrome oxidase II (COII) region used in multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and (ii) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) on amplified segments of cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene. Both methods were tested on Cuterebra larvae and on adult museum specimens. The two techniques showed a clear difference between C. grisea and C. fontinella , although species‐specific primers were more successful than RFLP for degraded DNA. No intraspecific variation in RFLP and species‐specific amplifications were detected for the two species of Cuterebra . The results exhibit discrepancies between molecular and morphological identification, suggesting that some of the adults were misidentified.
Base Sequence, Diptera, Molecular Sequence Data, DNA, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Electron Transport Complex IV, Myiasis, Peromyscus, Species Specificity, Animals, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
Base Sequence, Diptera, Molecular Sequence Data, DNA, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Electron Transport Complex IV, Myiasis, Peromyscus, Species Specificity, Animals, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
