Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Hospital resource use for COPD patients varies by both clinical commissioning group and primary care practices across nine CCGs in the United Kingdom

Authors: Lucy Rigge; Frank Ratcliff; Kate Lippiett; Lynn Josephs; Mike Thomas; Tom Wilkinson;

Hospital resource use for COPD patients varies by both clinical commissioning group and primary care practices across nine CCGs in the United Kingdom

Abstract

COPD causes a large disease and cost burden to the UK population. Key to understanding how to improve health within the COPD community and budget most efficiently, is understanding current practice uniformity in resource allocation. We have combined Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data and Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) Registry data to analyse the hospital resource use for COPD patients across the UK region of Wessex (April 2013 to March 2014). HES and QOF data was available for 320 Primary Care Practices and all 9 Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs). We compared the average inpatient spend and length of stay for a primary diagnosis of COPD per diagnosed COPD patient from the QOF registry at Practice and CCG level. Prevalence across the CCGs ranged from 1.2% to 2.0%. We found a difference in inpatient admission rates (per spell) varying from 79 to 148 spells per 1000 of the COPD population in individual practices and CCGs. This represents a 1.9 fold difference in admission rates across the CCGs and a 13-fold difference in mean in-patient spend per COPD patient when comparing the 10% of lowest-spend GP practices with the 10% of highest-spend GP practices. Length of stay varied from 5.3 to 7.7 days and did not uniformly correspond to differences in 30 day readmission rates. Assuming a higher number of COPD admissions reflects poorly controlled disease, this data suggests a range of disease control across the CCGs and individual practices, even allowing for static causes of poor COPD prognosis e.g. deprivation. This provides a basis for further analysis of potential factors contributing to the variation seen within the region.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!