
Abstract Motivation: Read simulators combined with alignment evaluation tools provide the most straightforward way to evaluate and compare mappers. Simulation of reads is accompanied by information about their positions in the source genome. This information is then used to evaluate alignments produced by the mapper. Finally, reports containing statistics of successful read alignments are created. In default of standards for encoding read origins, every evaluation tool has to be made explicitly compatible with the simulator used to generate reads. Results: To solve this obstacle, we have created a generic format Read Naming Format (Rnf) for assigning read names with encoded information about original positions. Futhermore, we have developed an associated software package RnfTools containing two principal components. MIShmash applies one of popular read simulating tools (among DwgSim, Art, Mason, CuReSim, etc.) and transforms the generated reads into Rnf format. LAVEnder evaluates then a given read mapper using simulated reads in Rnf format. A special attention is payed to mapping qualities that serve for parametrization of Roc curves, and to evaluation of the effect of read sample contamination. Availability and implementation: RnfTools: http://karel-brinda.github.io/rnftools Spec. of Rnf: http://karel-brinda.github.io/rnf-spec Contact: karel.brinda@univ-mlv.fr
Genomics (q-bio.GN), Genome, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Applications Notes, 004, FOS: Biological sciences, Humans, Quantitative Biology - Genomics, Computer Simulation, [INFO.INFO-BI]Computer Science [cs]/Bioinformatics [q-bio.QM], Software, [INFO.INFO-BI] Computer Science [cs]/Bioinformatics [q-bio.QM]
Genomics (q-bio.GN), Genome, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Applications Notes, 004, FOS: Biological sciences, Humans, Quantitative Biology - Genomics, Computer Simulation, [INFO.INFO-BI]Computer Science [cs]/Bioinformatics [q-bio.QM], Software, [INFO.INFO-BI] Computer Science [cs]/Bioinformatics [q-bio.QM]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
