Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Knee Surgery Sports ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer Nature TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Feedback improves the scapular‐focused treatment effects in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome

Authors: Mahsa Moslehi; Amir Letafatkar; Hadi Miri;

Feedback improves the scapular‐focused treatment effects in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of scapular‐focused treatment with (SFTF) and without (SFT) feedback on pain, function, and scapular kinematics in patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome (SIS).MethodsSeventy‐five males and females with SIS were randomly assigned into SFTF (n = 25), SFT (n = 25) and control (n = 25) groups. The primary outcome was pain, assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were function and scapular kinematics, assessed by DASH Questionnaire and a 3‐D motion capture, respectively. All outcomes were measured at the baseline and after the 8‐week interventions.ResultsA post hoc analysis performed to show significant differences between groups after the 8‐week interventions. For pain, there were significant differences between SFTF vs. SFT (ES (95% CI) = − 0.3(− 0.4 to − 0.1); P = 0.04), SFTF vs. control (ES (95% CI) = 1.3(0.7–1.9); P = 0.01). For DASH, also, there were significant differences between SFTF vs. SFT (ES (95% CI) = 1.8(1.1–2.4); P = 0.03), SFTF vs. control (ES (95% CI) = 4.4(3.3–5.4); P = 0.01), and SFT vs. control (ES (95% CI) = 2.6(1.8–3.4); P = 0.01). For scapular internal rotation (the sagittal or scapular planes), scapular upward rotation, and the scapular tilt, however, there were no differences between SFTF vs. SFT.ConclusionBased on the study results, a rehabilitation program integrated with verbal feedbacks is effective to relieve pain, and improve function and scapular kinematics in patients with SIS. Adding feedback to an exercise therapy could clinically enhance outcomes in patients with SIS.Level of evidenceLevel II.Trial registrationThis study was prospectively registered at UMIN‐CTR website, and the unique trail number is UMIN000036399.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Rotation, Visual Analog Scale, Middle Aged, Biomechanical Phenomena, Exercise Therapy, Feedback, Scapula, Treatment Outcome, Shoulder Impingement Syndrome, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Pain Measurement

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!