
pmc: PMC9646486 , PMC8811900
ABSTRACT With burgeoning human disease genetic associations and single-cell genomic atlases covering a range of tissues, there are unprecedented opportunities to systematically gain insights into the mechanisms of disease-causal variation. However, sparsity and noise, particularly in the context of single-cell epigenomic data, hamper the identification of disease- or trait-relevant cell types, states, and trajectories. To overcome these challenges, we have developed the SCAVENGE method, which maps causal variants to their relevant cellular context at single-cell resolution by employing the strategy of network propagation. We demonstrate how SCAVENGE can help identify key biological mechanisms underlying human genetic variation including enrichment of blood traits at distinct stages of human hematopoiesis, defining monocyte subsets that increase the risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and identifying intermediate lymphocyte developmental states that are critical for predisposition to acute leukemia. Our approach not only provides a framework for enabling variant-to-function insights at single-cell resolution, but also suggests a more general strategy for maximizing the inferences that can be made using single-cell genomic data.
Epigenomics, 1.1 Normal biological development and functioning, Human Genome, 610, COVID-19, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Biological Sciences, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Article, 004, Underpinning research, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Generic health relevance, Aetiology, Polymorphism, Genome-Wide Association Study
Epigenomics, 1.1 Normal biological development and functioning, Human Genome, 610, COVID-19, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Biological Sciences, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Article, 004, Underpinning research, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Generic health relevance, Aetiology, Polymorphism, Genome-Wide Association Study
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 57 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
