
Employing bibliometric approaches and network analysis this article seeks to explore the cooperation structures within German Political Science. We analyze a dataset consisting of 5279 articles that were published between 2000 and 2011 in 20 journals. We find an extreme unequal distribution of productivity as well as a trend towards more coauthorships - although single authors are still the norm. The network we constructed based on joint publications is in many aspects similar to those structures known from the natural sciences, but it is much smaller and more fragmented - we only find three larger components (49-112 authors). Finally we measure the importance of a single author within the network using a newly developed index that takes account of a persons' productivity as well as her position within the network. Adapted from the source document.
Allgemeines, spezielle Theorien und Schulen, Methoden, Entwicklung und Geschichte der Politikwissenschaft, Politikwissenschaft, Netzwerkanalyse, cooperation, author, scientometry, Kooperation, Scientometrics, Bibliometrics, Informetrics, Publikation, Scientometrie, Political science, network analysis, News media, journalism, publishing, Autor, Szientometrie, Bibliometrie, Informetrie, Netzwerk, publication, Bibliometrics, network, political science, Publizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen, Basic Research, General Concepts and History of Political Science, ddc: ddc:070, ddc: ddc:320
Allgemeines, spezielle Theorien und Schulen, Methoden, Entwicklung und Geschichte der Politikwissenschaft, Politikwissenschaft, Netzwerkanalyse, cooperation, author, scientometry, Kooperation, Scientometrics, Bibliometrics, Informetrics, Publikation, Scientometrie, Political science, network analysis, News media, journalism, publishing, Autor, Szientometrie, Bibliometrie, Informetrie, Netzwerk, publication, Bibliometrics, network, political science, Publizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen, Basic Research, General Concepts and History of Political Science, ddc: ddc:070, ddc: ddc:320
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
