Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Health of Manarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Health of Man
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Dexmedetomidine in the Program of Multimodal Low-opioid Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology

Authors: Tetiana Ovsiienko;

Dexmedetomidine in the Program of Multimodal Low-opioid Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology

Abstract

Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist, has become a valuable component of low-opioid multimodal anesthesia, providing sedative, anxiolytic and analgesic effects. The objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of using dexmedetomidine in a multimodal low opioid anesthesia program for laparoscopic renal surgery. Materials and methods. 55 patients who underwent laparoscopic renal surgery under two types of general anesthesia were included. All patients underwent surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Induction: intravenous propofol 2 mg/kg, fentanyl 1.5–2 μg/kg, atracurium 0.6 mg/kg. Anesthesia maintenance: sevoflurane (MAC – 1.44±0.25 vol.%). In group 1 analgesia was provided with fentanyl 3.89±2.1 μg/kg/h. Multimodal low-opioid anesthesia with fentanyl 2.38±1.01 μg/kg/h combined with dexmedetomidine 0.7 μg/kg/h was used in group 2. The efficacy of antinociceptive protection was assessed by the dynamics of changes in the levels of stress hormones, hemodynamic parameters, and blood glucose concentrations. Results. The total average doses of fentanyl used during the entire period of anesthesia were: 369.23±16.42 μg in group 1, 272.41±10,98 μg in group 2 (p<0.001). In patients of the control group 1, an increase in the plasma concentration of adrenocorticotropic hormone by 111.86% (p<0.01) from 25.7±2.1 pg/ml to 54.45±5.43 pg/ml was recorded (the study was conducted before the start of surgery and after the end of the operation), which was accompanied by a statistically significant increase cortisol concentration from 371.0±32.32 nmol/l to 562.72±45.37 nmol/l (by 51.67%) (p<0.01). In patients of the second group (dexmedetomidine group), an intraoperative increase in the plasma concentration of adrenocorticotropic hormone was recorded from 26.25±2.3 pg/l to 46.88±2.36 pg/l (by 78.59%) (p<0.01), which was accompanied by a statistically insignificant intraoperative increase in cortisol concentration from 393.51±25.0 nmol/l to 436.37±34.92 nmol/l – only by 10.89% (p>0.05). Blood glucose concentrations in the early postoperative period in the both groups were 6.79±0.31 mmol/l and 6.29±0.24 mmol/l, respectively (p>0.05). Hemodynamic parameters and BIS, which was maintained within 44±6.4%, indicated the adequacy of anesthesia and analgesia in both groups. Conclusions. The use of dexmedetomidine in multimodal low-opioid anesthesia for laparoscopic renal surgery provides the greatest antinociceptive protection and reduces the stress response to surgery.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    download downloads 4
  • 4
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
gold