Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

“Gloves-and-Socks” Melanoma

Does Histology Make a Difference?
Authors: Ethan, Soudry; Haim, Gutman; Meora, Feinmesser; Roee, Gutman; Jacob, Schachter;

“Gloves-and-Socks” Melanoma

Abstract

Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is associated with low survival.The aim of the study was to compare the clinical course of ALM, non-ALM hand and foot melanoma, and melanoma of the extremities in nonacral locations.Data on 168 patients operated on for cutaneous melanoma of the extremities from 1993 to 2005 were examined. Twenty-nine had ALM, 16 non-ALM, and 123 other-extremity melanoma. All known melanoma prognosticators were analyzed for their impact on survival at a median of 53 months' follow-up.The ALM group was significantly older (p=.015). No differences between the ALM and non-ALM groups were noted in tumor characteristics, lymph node status, and survival. However, the other-extremity melanoma group presented with significantly thinner lesions, fewer positive sentinel lymph nodes, and lower tumor stage and, consequently, had significantly better disease-specific and disease-free survival (p=.006, p=.0001). The acral lesions were nearly free of peritumoral lymphocytic infiltration. Multivariate analysis identified only tumor thickness (p=.0127), stage (p=.00001), and patient age (p=.012) as independent prognosticators of disease-specific survival.Cutaneous melanomas in acral sites, regardless of histology, tend to be diagnosed at an advanced stage probably owing to older patient age, difficult-to-see sites, and biologic factors, leading to reduced patient survival.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Skin Neoplasms, Adolescent, Foot, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Extremities, Middle Aged, Hand, Young Adult, Child, Preschool, Lymphatic Metastasis, Humans, Female, Child, Melanoma, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!