
This preprint reexamines the structural characteristics of numerical records in the Nihon Shoki, focusing on resolving apparent chronological and genealogical contradictions. By assuming the application of a "double-year" calendar system and possible editorial misinterpretations during the compilation process, the paper proposes new hypotheses regarding several figures, including Emperor Jinmu, Takeuchi no Sukune, Yamato Takeru, and Emperor Keitai. It also discusses the implications for alignment with Chinese dynastic histories and explores the rationale behind the assignment of posthumous titles. Author's Note: This paper is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. (Uses outside the following conditions—such as for commercial purposes or without the ShareAlike provision—require prior permission.) ・Attribution (BY): The author's name must be credited.・NonCommercial (NC): Free for non-commercial use, including summaries and translations. Commercial use requires prior permission.・ShareAlike (SA): Any derivative works (including summaries, adaptations, etc.) must be released under the same license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). The interpretive model presented here is an original proposal and does not conform to established academic chronologies. Contact: For inquiries regarding this work (including permissions for commercial use), please contact via the following website: https://tsurezureblog.sakuraweb.com/contact E-mail :h.shiina.contact@gmail.com
Yamato Takeru, Takeuchi no Sukune, Nihon Shoki, Japanese Mythology, Emperor Jinmu, History of Japan, Double-Year Calendar System, Emperor Keitai, Chronology, Japanese Ancient History
Yamato Takeru, Takeuchi no Sukune, Nihon Shoki, Japanese Mythology, Emperor Jinmu, History of Japan, Double-Year Calendar System, Emperor Keitai, Chronology, Japanese Ancient History
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
