Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Otolaryngologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Otolaryngology
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

S218 – Treatment Failures in Acute Otitis Externa

Authors: David W. Stroman; Peter S. Roland; G. Michael Wall; Celeste H. McLean;

S218 – Treatment Failures in Acute Otitis Externa

Abstract

ObjectivesUnderstand treatment failure rates of cipro‐floxacin/steroid‐ vs. Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Hydrocortisone (NPH)‐containing ear drops against the two major pathogens in acute otitis externa (AOE), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.MethodsRetrospective analysis of clinical studies involving NPH versus either 0.3% ciprofloxacin/0.1% dexamethasone (CDX)(2 trials, 1998–1999) or 0.2% ciprofloxacin/1% hydrocortisone (CHC) (3 trials, 1994–1996) in the treatment of patients diagnosed with AOE. Patients were randomized to treatment with either CHC, CDX (both bid) or NPH (tid), 3–4 drops per ear for 7 days. Microbiology specimens were collected from infected ears prior to the initiation of therapy, and at exit visit if there were any clinical signs of infection.ResultsThe therapy failure rate of P. aeruginosa for CDX and CHC was 6.7% (20/300) versus NPH at 12.8% (39/306), p = 0.017. The failure rate of S. aureus for CDX and CHC was 9.2% (6/65) vs. NPH at 8.3% (4/48), p = 0.87. In no instance of treatment failure was the pre‐therapy pathogen resistant in vitro to the antibiotics used to treat the infection. All of the persisting P. aeruginosa and S. aureus isolates were susceptible to fluoroquinolones and neomycin/polymyxin B.ConclusionsBased on data from 5 separate AOE clinical trials, ciprofloxacin‐containing ear drops, CDX and CHC, provided significantly greater eradication (93.3%) of P. aeruginosa compared to NPH ear drops (87.2%). There was no significant difference in the rate of eradication of S. aureus between the two groups of ear drops.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?