
AbstractIn bioaccumulation studies, sample devitalization through acid washing or oven drying is commonly applied to enhance the element accumulation efficiency of moss sample. Such aspect, however, has never been considered in biomonitoring surveys using lichens. In this study, the trace element accumulation performance of living (L) and dead (D) samples of the lichen Pseudevernia furfuracea was compared by a side-by-side transplanting at 40 sites in a large, mixed land use area of NE Italy for 8 weeks. Devitalization was achieved without any physico-chemical treatments, by storing lichen samples in a dark cool room for 18 months. Health status of lichens was assessed before and after the sample exposure by chlorophyll fluorescence emission. Although elemental analysis of the two exposed sample sets revealed a similar trace element pollution scenario, the content of 13 out of the 24 selected elements was higher in D samples. By expressing results as exposed-to-unexposed (EU) ratio, D samples show a higher bioaccumulation signal in 80% of transplant sites for Al, Ca, Fe, Hg, Pb and Ti. Overall, the health status of lichen samples might lead to interpretational discrepancies when EU ratio is classified according to the recently proposed bioaccumulation scale.
Air Pollutants, Lichens, Parmeliaceae, Bryophyta, Bioaccumulation, Lichen transplant, Italy, Interpretative scale, Pseudevernia furfuracea, Lichen transplants; Bioaccumulation; Devitalization; Interpretative scale; Pseudevernia furfuracea, Devitalization, Research Article, Environmental Monitoring
Air Pollutants, Lichens, Parmeliaceae, Bryophyta, Bioaccumulation, Lichen transplant, Italy, Interpretative scale, Pseudevernia furfuracea, Lichen transplants; Bioaccumulation; Devitalization; Interpretative scale; Pseudevernia furfuracea, Devitalization, Research Article, Environmental Monitoring
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
