
Intelligent-meshed mobile edge computing (IMMEC) network puts great emphasis on providing low latency services. This naturally requires using fast-timescale load balancing to avoid excessive delay resulted from overloading any particular network node. One natural candidate solution for such load balancing is distributed waterfilling algorithm. In this paper, we analyze its performance by comparing it against an ideal centralized version. It is shown that the worst-case average total latency difference between the two algorithms grows linearly with the size of the network and the propagation delay among different nodes.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
