Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Background: Ceramides are known to predict clinical cardiovascular diseases, but their role in prediction of subclinical atherosclerosis is unknown. Subjects and methods: We investigated significance of plasma ceramides using LC-MS/MS technique in prediction of subclinical atherosclerosis assessed by carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) in Young Finns Study cohort in 2007 (number:2197, age:30-45 years, women:45%). Statistical analysis was done with dichotomized cIMT data (cases: value ³ 90th percentile vs. controls: value <90th percentile). We focused on: i) risk ceramides- Cer(d18:1/16:0), Cer(d18:1/18:0), Cer(d18:1/24:1) and their ratios with protective ceramide - Cer(d18:1/24:0), and ii) Coronary Event Risk Test (CERT) score derived from these individual ceramides and their ratios. Reference predictive model with major traditional risk factors and two test predictive models with the ceramides or CERT scores added to the reference model were built. Risk factors were selected with bootstrap backward-stepwise algorithm. Model fitting and validation was done for 1000 bootstraps of the original data by: i) fitting models to training data (70% data), ii) testing the models on test data (30% data), and iii) calculate accuracy measure (ROC AUC). Results: Our results suggest moderate (reference AUC 0.762, 95% CI [0.699, 0.822], ceramides test AUC 0.77, 95% CI [0.711, 0.826], CERT test AUC 0.769, 95%CI [0.707, 0.824]) but significant (reference vs ceramides t-test P-value: 7.91e-10, reference vs. CERT t-test P-value: 3.49e-07) added value of the ceramides in predictive model for subclinical atherosclerosis. Conclusions: CERT and ceramide testing may help in predicting subclinical atherosclerosis for primary prevention more effectively than traditional risk factors alone.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 5 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts