
doi: 10.17615/gyjd-f184
This study describes a content analysis of archival MARC records conducted to detect the presence or absence of topical subject and form/genre terms taken from each collection's finding aid. The analysis measures the extent to which some archivists adapt information from finding aids for input into MARC records. Archival standards are discussed, as well as problems found to impede the process of manuscript cataloging using MARC. A sampling of topical subject and all form/genre terms were taken from twenty finding aids. After a search of the corresponding MARC records, less than half of the chosen topical terms were found. Additionally, only 43% of the form/genre terms were found in corresponding MARC records, suggesting that cataloging practice is not representing this information from finding aids well.
Archival description, Subject access, MARC system--Applications, Standardization--Cataloging, Archives--Cataloging
Archival description, Subject access, MARC system--Applications, Standardization--Cataloging, Archives--Cataloging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
