Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Between and within drug variation in copayments for common oral anti-cancer medications at an academic medical center.

Authors: Scott Swartz; Mackenzie Clark; Jared White; Mimi Lo; Arjun Gupta; Tracy Kuo Lin; Fumiko Chino; +1 Authors

Between and within drug variation in copayments for common oral anti-cancer medications at an academic medical center.

Abstract

18 Background: The use of oral anti-cancer medications- which are often high priced with significant cost sharing to the patient- is increasing. Transparency of out-of-pocket costs and payment responsibility has historically been limited due to the wide variation in coverage by insurance plans and pharmacy benefits. Our study utilized a novel pharmacy database to describe within-drug and between-drug variation in patient copayments for ten common oral anti-cancer medications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients prescribed an oral cancer-directed therapy through the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Specialty Pharmacy between January 1,2021 and December 31, 2021. The unit of analysis was defined as patient-drug. Copayments were standardized as 30-day costs. Data was abstracted through our institution’s Specialty Pharmacy prescribing database and linked to demographic data through the institutional electronic medical record system. Between drug variation in copayments was analyzed using Pearson chi square tests. Results: There were 1,357 total patient-drug combinations over the study period. Medicare Part D was the primary payor (44%) followed by commercial insurance (25%). The ten most frequently prescribed medications (Table) accounted for 50% of all oral anti-cancer prescriptions. Minimum monthly copayment for all medications was $0. There were significant differences across medications in the percentage of patients with a mean copayment above $150 (Χ2 = 33.9, p < 0.001) and percentage of patients receiving financial assistance (Χ2 = 63, p < 0.001). Conclusions: There was a high amount of within-drug and between-drug variation in copayments within an integrated specialty pharmacy program. It is essential to identify patients with high copayments early on in cancer treatment and connect them with tangible resources to help mitigate the growing financial impact of these medications.[Table: see text]

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!