Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Clinical anatomy and...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Clinical anatomy and operative surgery
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

ABDOMINAL ANAL RESECTIONS OF THE RECTUM. OWN RESULTS. INTERSFINCTER RESECTIONS. CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES

Authors: P. Senyutovych; S. Kravchuk; B. Shumko; V. Shulgina; I. Khalaturnyk; P. Vatamanyuk; Kh. Vatamanyuk;

ABDOMINAL ANAL RESECTIONS OF THE RECTUM. OWN RESULTS. INTERSFINCTER RESECTIONS. CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES

Abstract

The article presents current literature data on the eff ectiveness of intersphincteric resections, as well as a comparative analysis of their results of abdominal and anal resections of the rectum.A meta-analysis of foreign and domestic literature indicates that the incidence of postoperative mortality in intersphincteric resections of the rectum is 2%, complications – 10-15%, and fi ve-year survival is over 80%, but the functional consequences of operations want to be better because unsatisfactory results have a place in almost half of the patients.Our research shows that the mortality rate after abdominal and anal resections is 2.4%, postoperative complications – 15%, and fi ve-year survival – more than 77%. The functional results of abdominal and anal resections in low-ampullary rectal cancers were quite satisfactory in more than 90% of patients.Thus, intersphincteric resections of the rectum make it possible to preserve the closing function of the rectum after radical removal of malignant neoplasms of the lower ampullary and anal canal, but the use of this operation is controversial.In our opinion, it is necessary to more actively test the method of intersphincteric resection in the proctology departments of medical institutions of Ukraine.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research