Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Nateglinide Modified Release Dosage Form Using Elementary Osmotic Pump and Push Pull Osmotic Pump Methods: Formulation and in-vivo evaluation

Authors: null Fatima Shireen, M. Ajitha1, Roshan S;

Nateglinide Modified Release Dosage Form Using Elementary Osmotic Pump and Push Pull Osmotic Pump Methods: Formulation and in-vivo evaluation

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to develop osmotic tablets of nateglinide by two methods namely elementary osmotic pump (EOP) and push-pull osmotic pump (PPOP) method for controlled drug release. Methods: The tablets were prepared by the wet granulation and were evaluated for various physicochemical parameters, in-vitro dissolution and in-vitro dissolution. The optimised formulation obtained in both methods was further characterised for FTIR, stability studies and pharmacokinetic studies. Results: In EOP method coated tablet F14 showing highest drug release of 98.82%. In PPOP formulation FF14 was optimized with highest drug release of 99.97% and also its granules were having better flow property. Both F14 and FF14 were further characterized for FTIR, which showed no significant interaction and the accelerated studies indicated formulations were stable for 3months. The in-vivo studies in rabbits revealead Cmax of the optimised formulation (FF14) was 469.67±0.034 ng/ml, and the Cmax of the marketed product was 401.27±0.08 ng/ml. The Tmax of the formulation and the pure drug were 6.0±0.07 h and 1.5±0.04 h, respectively. The AUC0-infinity of the FF14 was higher ((2829.83±1.47 ng.h/ml) than the marketed suspension (1310.62±0.82 ng.h/ml). The AUC0-t of the FF14 formulation was significantly higher than that of the marketed product (p<0.05). Conclusion: A better improvement in-vitro dissolution profile and bioavailability of the osmotic tablet of nateglinide was observed using PPOP method.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!