Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Planta Daninhaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Planta Daninha
Article . 2007
Data sources: DOAJ
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Controle de plantas daninhas pelo amicarbazone aplicado na presença de palha de cana-de-açúcar Weed control by amicarbazone applied in the presence of sugar-cane straw

Authors: E. Negrisoli; C.V.S. Rossi; E.D. Velini; A.L. Cavenaghi; E.A.D. Costa; R.E.B. Toledo;

Controle de plantas daninhas pelo amicarbazone aplicado na presença de palha de cana-de-açúcar Weed control by amicarbazone applied in the presence of sugar-cane straw

Abstract

Considerando que a palha pode alterar a dinâmica e a eficácia dos herbicidas no sistema de cana-crua e complementar a ação destes, o objetivo deste trabalho foi verificar a eficácia do amicarbazone no controle de plantas daninhas presentes em variadas circunstâncias, incluindo a possibilidade de absorção do herbicida diretamente da palha de cana-de-açúcar. Para isso, conduziu-se um experimento em vasos com quatro repetições, em que, além das testemunhas com e sem palha, o amicarbazone foi aplicado em diferentes situações: sobre 5 t ha-1 de palha; sobre o solo posteriormente recoberto com 5 t ha-1 de palha; sobre o solo sem cobertura de palha e com ou sem simulação de distintas quantidades de chuva aplicada antes ou após aplicação do produto. A dose de amicarbazone aplicada foi de 1.400 g ha-1 de ingrediente ativo (i.a.), com consumo de calda equivalente a 200 L ha-1. As plantas daninhas utilizadas foram Brachiaria plantaginea, Brachiaria decumbens, Ipomoea grandifolia e Cyperus rotundus. Avaliaram-se a porcentagem de controle das plantas daninhas aos 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49 e 56 DAA, nos tratamentos em que o amicarbazone foi aplicado em pré-emergência, e aos 3, 10, 17, 24, 31 e 38 DAA, quando o herbicida foi aplicado em pós-emergência; a biomassa seca aos 56 ou 38 DAA; e a viabilidade dos tubérculos de C. rotundus, pelo teste de tetrazólio na última avaliação. Verificou-se que, independentemente da planta daninha avaliada, os maiores índices de controle foram alcançados quando o amicarbazone foi aplicado sobre a palha, simulando-se em seguida precipitação correspondente a 2,5 ou 30 mm de chuva, e nos tratamentos em que o herbicida foi aplicado diretamente no solo desnudo ou recoberto com palha. Dessa forma, para I. grandifolia, B. plantaginea e B. decumbens, patamares mais elevados de controle foram alcançados quando o amicarbazone atingiu o solo, tanto aplicado diretamente como quando lixiviado da palha pela chuva simulada após a aplicação. Já para C. rotundus, as maiores porcentagens de controle foram observadas quando o amicarbazone foi aplicado sobre a palha, com simulação de chuva imediatamente após a aplicação, evidenciando que a lixiviação pode ser um processo fundamental para uma apropriada absorção e eficácia do herbicida avaliado.Considering that straw can alter the dynamics and effectiveness of herbicides in the raw sugar-cane system, complementing their action, this work aimed to verify amicarbazone effectiveness in controlling weed plants under various conditions, including the possibility of herbicide absorption directly from sugar-cane straw. Thus, an experiment was set up in vases with four repetitions, using controls with and without straw, besides amicarbazone applied under different situations: on 5 t ha-1 of straw; on soil later covered with 5 t ha-1 of straw; on soil without straw cover and with or without simulation of different rainfall amounts applied before or after herbicide application. The amicarbazone rate applied was 1.400 g ha-1 of active ingredient (i.a.), with equivalent liquid consumption of 200 L ha-1. The weed plants used were Brachiaria plantaginea, Brachiaria decumbens, Ipomoea grandifolia and Cyperus rotundus. Weed plant control percentage was evaluated at 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49 and 56 days after application (DAA) in the treatments where amicarbazone was applied in pre-emergence and at 3, 10, 17, 24, 31 and 38 DAA, when the herbicide was applied in post-emergence; dry biomass was evaluated at 56 or 38 DAA as well as C. rotundus tuber viability, by applying the tetrazolium test during the last evaluation. It was verified that, regardless of the weed plant evaluated, the highest control indices were obtained when amicarbazone was applied on the straw, with a simulated rainfall corresponding to 2.5 or 30 mm of rain and in the treatments where the herbicide was applied directly in the soil without or with straw. Thus, for I. grandifolia, B. plantaginea and B. decumbens, higher control levels were verified when amicarbazone reached the soil, both when applied directly and when leached from the straw from the simulated rainfall after application. As for C. rotundus, the highest control percentages were observed when amicarbazone was applied on the straw, with rain simulation immediately after application, showing that leaching plays a fundamental role in providing an appropriate absorption and effectiveness of the herbicide evaluated.

Keywords

raw cane, QH301-705.5, Botany, effectiveness, lixiviação, leaching, herbicide, eficácia, QK1-989, cana-crua, herbicida, Biology (General)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold