
Buta Ranquil es un pueblo de la Patagonia argentina centrado en una ganadería de autosubsistencia donde, a principios de siglo, se inicia la explotación hidrocarburífera en un yacimiento aledaño. Las obras de construcción civil relacionadas con la producción de petróleo dan paso al arribo migratorio de obreros. En poco tiempo, se altera el estilo de vida tradicional y contrasta con la nueva dinámica social que trae aparejada la industria y el comercio. En el presente artículo, el objetivo es analizar cómo operan categorías de adscripción avaladas consuetudinariamente entre los pobladores originarios y la población migrante observando la dinámica política. Estas categorías de adscripción son de marcos conceptuales y estigmatizadores donde se sitúa la distancia social entre migrantes y originarios. Retomamos categorías antropológicas como las de “rumor” y “reputación” a fin de comprender de qué manera la experiencia social del nuevo contexto productivo impacta sobre el entramado sociocultural preexistente. Finalmente, sostendremos que las afinidades personales con base en estas categorías tensionan el cotidiano de alianzas políticas definidas en marcos regionales más amplios.At the beginning of the 21th century, hydrocarbon exploitation began in Buta Ranquil, an Argentine village situated in north Patagonia and grounded on a traditional peasant subsistence economy. There, civil construction related with oil production started and promoted the arrival of migrant workmen. In a very short period of time, the traditional peasant’s way of life started to change and contrast with the new social dynamics that the industry and commerce brought along. In this article, the objective is to analyze how consuetudinary categories of adscription work in a context of social change between the original inhabitants and migrants, focusing on the political dynamics. We argue that these categories serve as frameworks in which social distance regarding newcomers is part of a process of stigmatization. In addition, working with anthropological categories such as “rumor” and “reputation” enables us to understand how the new productive context impacts the pre-existing socio-cultural framework. Finally, we will argue that personal affinities based on these categories of adscription stress political alliances built over regional frames.
G, cambio social, political dynamic, categorías de adscripción, stigma, categories of adscription, Anthropology, estigma, social change, Geography. Anthropology. Recreation, dinámica política, GN1-890
G, cambio social, political dynamic, categorías de adscripción, stigma, categories of adscription, Anthropology, estigma, social change, Geography. Anthropology. Recreation, dinámica política, GN1-890
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
