
O objetivo do artigo é enfatizar o lugar que ocupa a economia na cosmovisão política de Aristóteles, assumindo o pressuposto segundo o qual o filósofo considera a economia como uma dimensão central da mesma forma que uma condição de possibilidade para pensar a comunidade política. Nesse sentido, percorre-se três aspectos de tal problemática. O primeiro aspecto, o mais visível, cujo descobrimento é mérito da hermenêutica arendtiana, é aquele que diz respeito especificamente ao problema da crematística como desconstrução do objeto da política, considerada como vida comunitária ligada ao bom viver. O segundo aspecto é o que conduz o filósofo a vincular, pela primeira vez na história do Ocidente, os regimes políticos à estrutura social da polis. O terceiro aspecto consiste em realizar uma leitura dos regimes políticos na chave econômica, aspecto central das profundas críticas de Aristóteles à oligarquia. Desse modo, deixa-se explícita outra das hipóteses que se sustenta no texto: a de que as reflexões de Aristóteles se concentram na noção de esfera pública e, por isso, privilegiam teoricamente a aristocracia, a politeia e, inclusive, a democracia.The objetive of the article is to emphasize the place of economics in the political cosmovision of Aristotle under the assumption of economics as a central dimension and a prerequisite of the philosopher's thinking about political community. In that sense, it covers three aspects of that problematic. The firs aspect, the most visible one, which discovery is merit of Arendtian hermeneutics, attends specifically to the problem of bad chrematistic as a deconstruction of the politics's object, in so far as communitarian life is related to the good life. The second aspect allows the philosopher to relate, for the first time in Western history, the political regimes to the social structure of the polis. The third aspect implies a vision of political regimes in economic terms and is the core of Aristotle's profound criticism of oligarchy. In that way, it makes explicit another assumptiom of this paper: that Aristotle's reflections are concentrated on the notion of public sphere and, for that reason, they privilege theoretically aristocracy, politeia, and even democracy.
Economics, Politics, Economia, Política, Regimes políticos, Crematística, HM401-1281, Political science (General), Political regimes, Sociology (General), Chrematistic, JA1-92
Economics, Politics, Economia, Política, Regimes políticos, Crematística, HM401-1281, Political science (General), Political regimes, Sociology (General), Chrematistic, JA1-92
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
