Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Digital Object Repos...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Extraction of uranium and thorium from Swiss granites and their microdistribution. 1. Extraction of uranium and thorium

Authors: Bajo, C.; Rybach, L.; Weibel, M.;

Extraction of uranium and thorium from Swiss granites and their microdistribution. 1. Extraction of uranium and thorium

Abstract

This work is concerned with the extraction, at the laboratory level, of uranium and thorium from Swiss granites. The Mittagfluh, Bergell and Rotondo granites and the Giuv syenite offered a wide range of U and Th concentrations: 7.7-20.0 ppm U and 25.5-67.0 ppm Th. U and Th were determined in leachates by the fission track method and by spectrophotometry respectively. Samples, containing < 0.3 μg U and 4 μg Th, could be measured with an accuracy of 10% for U and 5% for Th. Leaching experiments were performed during which the following parameters were varied: granite type, grain size, acid type, acid concentration, temperature and time. There were large leaching differences between the granites studied. Grain size caused no great variation; the extracted percentages of U and Th were practically the same for any particular rock with either 12% (coarse) or 71% (fine) of the grain size finer than 0.125 mm. The leached fraction with H2SO4 was somewhat smaller than with HCl or HNO3. The difference in leaching with 2, 5 and 10 M HCl was negligible. Temperature was the most important parameter. Sharp differences in extraction occurred between 20°, 50° and 80°C. At 80°C more than 85% of the U and Th were extracted. The extraction curve (percent extracted as a function of time) of aliquots sampled after 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hr. showed a plateau after 8 hr. As a general rule, Th was more easily extracted than U. The granites investigated showed widely different U and Th leachability (13-75% U, 32-75% Th upon treatment of rock powder in 5 M HCl at 20°C for 24 hr.). A separate study was devoted to relate these differences to peculiarities in the U and Th microdistribution in these rocks (Part 2). 

Country
Switzerland
Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!