Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Radboud Repositoryarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Radboud Repository
Article . 2002
Data sources: Radboud Repository
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Cumulative Advantages and Inequality in Lifestyle. A Dutch Description of Distinction in Taste

Authors: Kraaykamp, G.L.M.;

Cumulative Advantages and Inequality in Lifestyle. A Dutch Description of Distinction in Taste

Abstract

In this article I study Bourdieu's distinction of status groups based on cultural and economic resources using recent data on a representative sample of the Dutch population (N=1561). More specifically, I examine the consequences of a accumulation of cultural and economic resources for taste differentiation. The research question reads: To what extent do people with cultural as well as economic resources differ in taste from people with primarily economic or cultural resources? First, I construct a multi-dimensional social space in which I largely follow Bourdieu in differentiating between a person's amount of resources and type of resources. As an elaboration at each class level a status group that combines cultural and economic resources is considered. Second, I analyze differences in cultural consumption, materialistic preferences and eating and drinking habits, to test whether my representation of the social space is reflected in taste differences. My research clearly shows that in the Netherlands there is taste differentiation between status groups with cumulated resources and status groups with specific types of resources (at each class level). For most of the 36 taste expressions meaningful within-class differences for the group with cumulated resources are revealed.

Contains fulltext : 62265.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)

Country
Netherlands
Related Organizations
Keywords

Inequality, cohesion and modernization, Ongelijkheid, cohesie en modernisering

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities