Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Proceedings of Inter...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Twin-Rotor Wind Turbine Power Performance Compared to a Single-Rotor of the Same Tip-to-Tip Spacing

Twin-Rotor Wind Turbine Power Performance Compared to a Single-Rotor of the Same Tip-to-Tip Spacing

Abstract

This work introduces a comparison between the conventional single-rotor wind turbine, and a twin-rotor wind turbine. Multi-Rotor wind turbine concept solves many drawbacks of the single-rotor, including ease of transport, installation, and maintenance, in addition to reduced mass of the whole turbine. In this work, the NREL 5MW wind turbine has been scaled down to a single rotor configuration of 40 cm diameter, and a twin-rotor configuration with two 20 cm diameter rotors, such that both configurations have the same span. Blade Element Momentum (BEM) theory has been used for simulations to calculate aerodynamic loads and produced power. The BEM algorithm was verified by performing a simulation on the original NREL 5MW rotor and compared to the definition report of the turbine. Simulations on the scaled-down single and twin rotor configurations have shown that although the produced power by the twin-rotor is 50% of that of the single-rotor, but the thrust load is 50%, rotor torque is 20%, and overall mass is 25% of the single-rotor configuration. The reduced inertial and aerodynamic load indicate lower cost of energy, and hence the twin-rotor is superior to the single-rotor of the same span size.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold