Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of the Facul...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Drought Tolerance of Geophytes

Drought Tolerance of Geophytes

Abstract

Drought tolerance was determined in 45 species/cultivars of 29 genera of seven families of geophytes. Salt water irrigation at concentrations of 0, 500, 1000, 5,000 mgl^ was used. Fourteen species/cultivars with no salt treatment (control) either did not flower or flowered at very low rates. This was probably because no fiowers were initiated or flower buds aborted at high temperatures of greenhouse. The remaining 29 species/cultivars were classified into eight categories using three fiowering characteristics (flowering rate, plant height and days to flower) to the salt treatments. Flower characteristics were not affected in Muscari armeniacum with 5,000 mgl^ salt treatment. Thus it was the most drought tolerant among the geophytes examined. In other geophytes, at least one characteristic was more or less affeeted by the treatment. Generally, spring-flowering geophytes tended to be more tolerant than summer-flowering geophytes. However, there were no clear relationships between families, classified categories and the types of storage organs (bulbs, corms, etc.). Salt (drought) tolerance in geophytes appears to be species/cultiver-specific.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold