Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Seeking muscle stem cells.

Authors: J B, Miller; L, Schaefer; J A, Dominov;

Seeking muscle stem cells.

Abstract

Skeletal muscle development requires the formation of myoblasts that can fuse with each other to form multinucleate myofibers. Distinct primary and secondary, slow and fast, populations of myofibers form by the time of birth. At embryonic, fetal, and perinatal stages of development, temporally distinct lineages of myogenic cells arise and contribute to the formation of these multiple types of myofibers. In addition, spatially distinct lineages of myogenic cells arise and form the anterior head muscles, limb (hypaxial) muscles, and dorsal (epaxial) muscles. There is strong evidence that myoblasts are produced from muscle stem cells, which are self-renewing cells that do not themselves terminally differentiate but produce progeny that are capable of becoming myoblasts and myofibers. Muscle stem cells, which may be multipotent, appear to be distinguishable from myoblasts by a number of indirect and direct criteria. Muscle stem cells arise either in unsegmented paraxial mesoderm (anterior head muscle progenitors) or in segmented mesoderm of the somites (epaxial and hypaxial muscle progenitors). These initial stages of myogenesis are regulated by positive and negative signals, including Wnt, BMP, and Shh family members, from nearby notochord, neural tube, ectoderm, and lateral mesoderm tissues. The formation of skeletal muscles, therefore, depends on the generation of spatially and temporally distinct lineages of myogenic cells. Myogenic cell lineages begin with muscle stem cells which produce the myoblasts that fuse to form myofibers.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Muscles, Stem Cells, Animals, Humans, Cell Lineage

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    90
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
90
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!