Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Breast cancer: axillary dissection--or an unnecessary procedure?].

Authors: P, Schäfer;

[Breast cancer: axillary dissection--or an unnecessary procedure?].

Abstract

The status of the axillary lymph nodes is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast cancer. The presence or absence of metastatic lymph nodes is of primordial importance for the choice of adjuvant therapy. Early diagnosis of breast cancer, a result of widespread use of screening mammography, has increased considerably the number of detected in situ cancer and small invasive cancer without involved lymph nodes. Up to now there exists no conclusive study concerning the curative value of axillary dissection. In contrast, the complications of this procedure, especially in the long run, are non-negligible, creating controversy over its use. In situ carcinoma is no longer considered an indication for axillary dissection, nor is micro-invasive cancer (< or = 2 mm). In absence of accurate imaging and valid alternatives to exploratory surgery, new less traumatising procedures are currently under investigation: axillary fat aspiration with endoscopic axillary surgery, or the sentinel lymph node biopsy which is enlarged in case of a positive histology to a full axillary dissection. This approach will permit in the near future a reduction of morbidity to a strict minimum due to surgical treatment in the node-negative patient.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Biopsy, Lymphatic Metastasis, Axilla, Humans, Lymph Node Excision, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Lymph Nodes, Prognosis, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!