Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Lowering cholesterol 1998. Cholesterol synthesis inhibitors compared].

Authors: K M, Kostner; G M, Kostner;

[Lowering cholesterol 1998. Cholesterol synthesis inhibitors compared].

Abstract

Large scale primary and secondary prevention trials in recent years have revealed that the effective lipid reducing therapy with statins can reduce mortality of coronary heart disease by up to 30%. For the first time it has become possible to reduce LDL-cholesterol pharmacologically by more than 50%, a reduction that was only achieved by LDL-apheresis so far. Cost-effectiveness is becoming an important issue since this varies widely between patients according to the coronary risk. Treating the patients with the highest coronary risk is most cost effective. Currently, there are six statins on the market. Reduction of LDL-cholesterol is mainly mediated by the induction of LDL-receptor activity in the liver. In addition, some statins at high doses also reduce LDL-cholesterol synthesis. Due to variations in the molecular structure of the active compounds these 6 statins have important pharmacological differences, such as their capacity to reduce plasma triglycerides, their interaction with other drugs. The daily recommended doses of the statins range from 0.1 mg (cerivastatin) to 80 mg (atorvastatin). In this review the differences in the pharmacological and clinical actions of the statins are analyzed.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Structure-Activity Relationship, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Reference Values, Risk Factors, Anticholesteremic Agents, Hypercholesterolemia, Humans, Drug Interactions, Cholesterol, LDL, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!