
pmid: 9805168
pmc: PMC2277928
To assess Ontario family physicians' attitudes toward, awareness of, and practices related to self-help groups in general and cancer self-help groups specifically.Mailed survey using a modified Dillman method.Ontario family practices.A random sample of 1500 Ontario members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada, of whom 949 responded. A total of 911 completed questionnaires were received, for an eligible response rate of 64%.Physician demographics, practice characteristics; extent of awareness of self-help groups and their perceived value; attitudes toward self-help groups; practices related to interactions with patients about self-help groups.Only 40.2% of respondents were aware of six or more self-help groups in their region; 56.8% were aware of at least one cancer self-help group. Discussions with patients about groups were reported as occurring "frequently" by 12% of respondents, who indicated they made referrals to an array of groups. Ratings of group helpfulness were relatively high (83.8% scoring 3, 4, or 5 on a 5-point scale, where 5 is "very helpful"). There were low ratings of potential harm (1% scoring 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale, where 5 is "very harmful"). Confidence intervals for proportions reported on in this paper were all within 4%.Family physicians have predominantly positive attitudes about the potential benefits of self-help groups, and many are recommending groups to their patients.
Male, Ontario, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Physicians, Family, Self-Help Groups, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Referral and Consultation
Male, Ontario, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Physicians, Family, Self-Help Groups, Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Referral and Consultation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
