
The microenvironment influences the progression of an epithelial malignancy. To examine the effect of fibroblasts on epithelial cells by direct cell-cell contact in vitro, a coculture system was designed to assess cell death and proliferation of two cell populations when grown together. We used a green fluorescent dye to stain fibroblasts and distinguish them from unstained epithelial cells by a flow cytometer. We show that tumor cell death is 5-fold less when cocultured with normal human prostatic fibroblasts than when cultured alone. In contrast, proliferation of tumor cells was similar when cocultured with normal human prostatic fibroblasts or when grown alone. The reduction in tumor cell death during coculture appears to play a significant role in promoting tumor formation. Combination of prostatic fibroblasts with LNCaP xenografts formed large tumors at a high frequency with a low apoptotic index in vivo, whereas, LNCaP xenografts alone formed small infrequent tumors with a high apoptotic index. Therefore, prostatic fibroblasts promote tumor formation by retarding the apoptotic pathways in tumor cells.
Male, Cell Death, Staining and Labeling, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Epithelial Cells, Cell Communication, Fibroblasts, Flow Cytometry, Fluoresceins, Coculture Techniques, Mice, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Animals, Humans, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Aetiology, Cell Division, Cancer, Non-programmatic
Male, Cell Death, Staining and Labeling, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Prostate, Prostatic Neoplasms, Epithelial Cells, Cell Communication, Fibroblasts, Flow Cytometry, Fluoresceins, Coculture Techniques, Mice, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Animals, Humans, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Aetiology, Cell Division, Cancer, Non-programmatic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 42 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
