Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The natural history of angina in a general practice.

Authors: J, Fry;

The natural history of angina in a general practice.

Abstract

An appreciation of the natural history of angina pectoris is important when deciding on the place of new and potentially dangerous forms of treatment. During 1950-1975, 268 patients with angina were diagnosed and followed up in my London general practice. The annual incidence, in adults over 40, was five per 1,000 and increased with age.During the period of follow-up, half the patients died, an annual mortality of 4.6 per cent. However, among the survivors one third ceased to suffer anginal symptoms spontaneously and without specific therapy. Of those who continued to suffer from angina, in 71 per cent the condition was graded as minor, in 27 per cent as moderate, and in only two per cent were the attacks severe and disabling. Usually the angina was primary (77 per cent) and it was secondary, after myocardial infarction, in 23 per cent.Of the 134 deaths, three quarters were from a cardiovascular cause. This group of angina patients had a 2:1 times greater observed, than expected, risk of dying (O/E ratio). The O/E mortality ratio fell progressively with age. It was highest in the 40-49 decade (4.0) and lowest in the over 80s, when the observed mortality rate was less than expected (0.9). The O/E mortality ratio was higher in men (2.3) than in women (1.7).From this survey I conclude that angina does not have a uniformly bad prognosis, and that with the advent of beta-adrenergic blockers, the proportion considered for angiocardiography and aorto-coronary bypass grafting should be less than five per cent of all patients with angina.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Angina Pectoris, London, Humans, Female, Family Practice, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!