Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Platelet refractoriness and alloimmunization.

Authors: S J, Slichter;

Platelet refractoriness and alloimmunization.

Abstract

The two major methods of modifying donor blood products to prevent alloimmunization are leukocyte reduction or ultraviolet B (UVB) irradiation. Two studies have suggested that leukocyte reduction to levels <5 x 10(6) may be required to prevent alloantibody production. Three prospective, randomized transfusion trials demonstrated a statistically significant (P < 0.05) decrease in both platelet refractoriness and lymphocytotoxic antibody production in patients who received leukocyte-reduced blood components as compared to those who received standard unmodified blood products. The results of the Trial to Reduce Alloimmunization to Platelets (TRAP trial) further confirm the potential beneficial effects of leukocyte-reduced and UVB-irradiated blood products in preventing alloimmune platelet refractoriness. Five hundred thirty antibody-negative patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia were randomly assigned to receive either unmodified platelet concentrates, filtered leukocyte-reduced platelet concentrates, UVB-irradiated platelet concentrates, or filtered leukocyte-reduced platelets obtained by apheresis. Patients who received modified platelet components had statistically significantly lower rates of both alloimmune platelet refractoriness and lymphocytotoxic antibodies than did patients who received unmodified platelet components. There were no differences in any study endpoints among patients who received any of the three modified platelet components. The investigators concluded that leukocyte-reduced and UVB-irradiated platelet components were equally effective in preventing alloimmune-mediated platelet refractoriness; platelets obtained by apheresis provided no additional benefit.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Blood Platelets, Isoantibodies, Antibody Formation, Leukocytes, Humans, Blood Component Transfusion, Cell Separation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!